Payara Platform vs. The Competition

Payara Platform

Can the Payara Platform solve the problems you’re having with your current application server? Find your runtime below and learn how the Payara Platform overcomes your challenges.

Payara Server Enterprise is the best application platform for production Jakarta EE (Java EE)  apps.

Learn More

Payara Micro Enterprise is the lightweight middleware platform of choice for containerized Jakarta EE (Java EE)  microservices deployments.

Learn More

Compare Your App Server to Payara Platform

View the following comparison tables and infographics to see how the features and benefits of Payara Server and Payara Micro compare to other application servers.

GlassFish

Running GlassFish and worried about the lack of support, infrequent application server releases, and lack of bug fixes? Migrate to Payara Server.

Compare GlassFish

WebLogic

Migrating from Oracle WebLogic Server to Payara Server can be a simple and straightforward process because both servers rely on the Java EE specifications.

Compare WebLogic

TomEE

Using TomEE but need more frequent releases, greater security, and automatic clustering? Migrate to Payara Server.

Compare TomEE

JBoss EAP

Tired of paying extra for data grid (caching) with JBoss? Want a monthly component upgrade schedule, Slow SQL Logging, Health Check Service, and included OAuth2 / OpenID Connect Support at no additional cost? Migrate to Payara Server.

Compare JBoss

Tomcat

Using Tomcat for simple web applications and wish microservices features were built-in? Wish you had access to knowledgeable support services? Migrate to Payara Server.

Compare Tomcat

WildFly

Wish you had a supported application server with regular releases and component upgrades? Need a health check service, slow SQL logging, additional notification channels monitoring with an integrated monitoring console? Migrate from WildFly 20 to Payara Server.

Compare WildFly

Quarkus

Quarkus focuses on fast start up time but not without some costs. If you need a more mature ecosystem that performs well under load and is not coupled with the downsides of GraalVM. Consider migrating to Payara Micro.

Compare Quarkus

Helidon

If you need support for older JDK versions, Jakarta EE compatibility, automatic clustering or production support then you may want to consider migrating to Payara Micro.

Compare Helidon

WebSphere

If you prefer an Open Source license, need Data Grid (caching), and want the ability to use admin command recording and auditing, migrate to Payara Server Enterprise.

Compare WebSphere

Contact UsMigration Resources

GlassFish vs. Payara Server

The Migration & Project Support that I’ve received from the Payara Engineers has been exceptional thus far. They helped me pinpoint an issue that we’ve been having and also referenced me to the GitHub page where another user had a similar issue. Furthermore, they have back-tested the issue that we’d experienced and figured out what the latest version is that we can upgrade to, where our existing code-base would still work. In the meantime, while the Support Team was busy investigating the issue, we migrated from GlassFish to Payara Server on one of our production servers. Thus far, the transition has been seamless and exciting.

Mark Bekker, HelloGroup

Overall the migration from GlassFish 3 over to Payara Platform 5 was a straightforward process. There was no need for major code rewrites. Setar invested in the Migration & Project Support for help during the migration process and Payara’s engineering team was clearly knowledgeable when answering the support tickets.

I’m enjoying the fact that all my knowledge about GlassFish can now be applied to the usage of Payara Platform. There is no need to put time aside to learn about a different technology, our team can start working with Payara Platform hands on straight away.

Enrick Lopez, lead developer at SETAR NV

WebLogic vs. Payara Server

We migrated the backend of the product we built for our client from WebLogic to Payara Server with great success. Payara Server has a much more modern feature-set and feel, gets you up and running quicker and we saved a lot of time configuring the server compared to WebLogic. Several things that were a big hassle to configure with WebLogic worked out of the box with Payara Server, Bean Validation being a prime example of this. We are now looking to the future and planning a move towards a more microservices oriented architecture with Payara Micro in mind. I would recommend both Payara Server and Payara Micro to anybody who values consistency, stability and productivity for their application development and deployment.

Daniel Löfquist, HiQ

TomEE vs. Payara Server

JBoss EAP vs. Payara Server

Tomcat vs. Payara Server

WildFly vs. Payara Server

Quarkus Vs Payara Micro

Helidon Vs Payara Micro

WebSphere VS. Payara Server Enterprise

Back to top